The University of Windsor Animal Care Committee (ACC) (hereafter referred to as “the Committee”) reports directly to the Vice-President, Research. The Committee operates to fulfil the Universitys legal and ethical responsibilities concerning the use of live, non-human vertebrate animals (hereafter referred to as ‘animals’) in research and teaching. The Committee also is empowered to ensure that the quality and operation of its animal housing facilities, and the care and use of animals in research and teaching are in accordance with guidelines established by the Canadian Council on Animal Care (CCAC), the Province of Ontarios Animals for Research Act, and the University of Windsor procedures as well as other professional and ethical codes and guidelines.
The jurisdiction of the Committee extends to all teaching and research activities involving animals conducted on or off-campus by University faculty, students, and staff.
The Animal Care Coordinator whose role is as follows:
* Other persons may be co-opted as required.
3.0. Terms of Office
3.1. The chair of the ACC is appointed by the Vice-President, Research, from among the members of the Committee.
3.2. The members of the ACC are appointed by the Vice-President, Research, on the recommendation of the faculty deans.
3.3. Each member of the Committee will serve for a three-year term subject to a maximum of one renewal. The exceptions to this are the consulting veterinarian and the animal care personnel, all of whom serve for indefinite terms.
3.4. The Animal Care Coordinator shall serve as secretary to the Committee.
3.5. All members of the ACC are full voting members except ex-officio members.
4.0. Frequency of Meetings
4.1. The Committee normally meets four times per year. Additional meetings may be called as necessary. Regular Committee meetings are scheduled for the first week of January/April/July/October. All meetings of the Committee will be scheduled within these weeks at a time convenient to all members of the Committee, and must have a quorum consisting of a majority of Committee members, including the Ethics and Grants Coordinator, Community Representative, Veterinarian, and Chairperson of the ACC.
4.2. Detailed minutes of each meeting will be taken outlining Committee discussions, decisions, and recommendations for revisions with respect to each protocol under review as well as procedural and other issues related to the care and use of animals. Decisions are reached using a consensus model. A copy of each set of minutes will be distributed to each member of the ACC and to the Vice-President, Research.
4.3. In addition to meetings, members of the Committee will conduct, at least annually, one site visit to each of the animal facilities. The consulting veterinarian, either independently, with the animal care personnel and/or chair of the ACC, will conduct site visits to each facility on a more regular basis and at least once per term. The observations from every inspection tour, together with any recommendations and/or commendations, will be discussed at the subsequent ACC meeting and included in the minutes. A report will be provided to the administration of each animal facility as required.
The ACC has the authority, on behalf of the senior administrator responsible for animal care and use for the institution, to:
5.1 Stop any objectionable procedure if it considers that unnecessary distress or pain is being experienced by an animal;
5.2 Stop immediately any use of animals which deviates from the approved use, any non approved procedure, or any procedure causing unforeseen pain or distress to animals; and
5.3 Have an animal killed humanely if pain or distress caused to the animal is not part of the approve protocol and cannot be alleviated.
The chair and veterinarian has access at all times to areas where animals are or may be held or used.
6.0. Responsibilities and Duties
The ACC will have responsibilities in a number of areas as noted below.
6.1. Ethics Review Mandate
6.1.1. All research and teaching activities involving animals may not begin, and animals may not be acquired without prior ethics review and approval of a written animal use protocol. The content of the animal use protocol must comply with that recommended by the CCAC. The ethics review and approval process, which is conducted by the ACC, ensures that all protocols comply with the requirements of the CCAC and the Animals for Research Act.
6.1.2. Procedures will be established for the submission, consideration, interim approval, approval, or disapproval of animal research and teaching protocols.
6.1.3. All research and teaching projects involving animals shall be reviewed to determine that the proposed procedures are in accord with relevant provincial legislation and CCAC guidelines and complete, accurate, and current records of the protocols and review process shall be kept. The decisions of the Committee, and any required revisions, shall be communicated in writing to the respective researchers and that a follow-up mechanism be developed to ensure that the required revisions are received.
6.1.4. Subsequent to receiving an approved AUPP, the principal investigator may make minor changes to the AUPP by filing a “Request to Revise Form” with the ACC. Minor changes would include a small increase in the number of animals required, addition of a student to the project, change in funding source, minor change in experimental protocol, etc. Such minor changes can be approved by the chair of the ACC or his/her delegate. Any major changes proposed to an existing AUPP such as an considerable increase in the number of animals, change in species, need for more invasive procedures, or an entirely new procedure will require submission of a new AUPP and subsequent approval of the new AUPP by the ACC before any animals can be acquired and funds released for the project.
6.1.5. At least once a year all researchers will be required to complete and submit a signed Progress Report for each active protocol. These progress report forms will be reviewed and approved by the ACC and complete, accurate, and current records of extensions of approval and the review process will be kept. This report may also serve as a Request to Renew the AUPP for an additional year.
6.1.6. All researchers will be required to complete and submit a signed Final Report for each completed protocol. These final reports will be reviewed and approved by the ACC.
6.1.7. A new Animal Utilization Project Proposal (AUPP) must be submitted after the submission of three consecutive Progress/Renewal Reports if the research is to continue.
6.1.8. Conduct a site visit annually to all animal holding sites on campus and provide a written report on the following issues: 1) the appropriate AUPP and responsible PI posted in each room, 2) cleanliness of cages in each room, 3) apparent health of animals in each room, 4) temperature and humidity in each room, and 5) up to date record of animal husbandry data posted in each room. Provide VP- Research with a copy of the report to all ACC members.
6.1.9. Conduct routine post-approval monitoring visits as outlined in SOP AD-14.
6.2. Scientific and Educational Merit Review Mandate
6.2.1. All protocols involving the use of animals must undergo peer review for scientific or educational merit prior to undergoing ethics review and approval through the ACC.
6.2.2. All non-funded and non-externally peer-reviewed research projects involving animals must undergo prior review for scientific merit as per SOP AD-04 (Assessment of Research Protocols in the Absence of Peer Reviews). This includes pilot research and contract or grant research.
6.2.3. The ACC itself does not conduct formal scientific or educational merit review for non-funded, non-externally reviewed projects. This is done by the VP Research at the request of the principle investigator or Chair of the ACC. Once a research proposal has received positive external reviews, the applicant will invited by the VP Research to submit an AUPP to the ACC.
6.2.4. Protocols which are grant-funded and undergo scientific merit review as part of the peer review process established by the granting/funding agency are not required to undergo additional scientific merit review.
6.2.5. Projects which are conducted as undergraduate or graduate level course or laboratory/ teaching assignments must undergo peer review for educational merit.
6.3. Animal Welfare Mandate
6.3.1. Any objectionable procedure which results in an animal experiencing unnecessary distress or pain shall be stopped.
6.3.2. Any use of animals for purposes other than those already approved or use of non-approved procedures shall be stopped.
6.3.3. Any animal that is in pain or distress that cannot be alleviated shall be humanely killed. This may be decided at the discretion of the veterinarian.
6.3.4. Adequate veterinary care is provided to all animals regardless of the stage in life span and access to veterinary care is available in cases of injury, illness or surgery.
6.3.5. A set of standard operating procedures shall be developed and reviewed on a regular basis for animal husbandry, facility and equipment management, alleviation for pain or distress, proper and effective use of anaesthesia and analgesia, pre- and post-operative care and monitoring, procedures for euthanasia, and other areas as required.
6.3.6. These standard operating procedures shall be communicated to animal health technicians, animal researchers, and course instructors and these procedures should be implemented and reviewed regularly.
6.3.7. A crisis management program for the animal facilities and the animal care and use program shall be established in conjunction with the Universitys general institutional crisis management plan.
6.4. Research Animal Care Facility Mandate
6.4.1. Animals are housed or maintained only in areas that have been inspected and approved for this purpose.
6.4.2. All animal facilities are inspected on an annual basis at a minimum and the facilities and animal care provided within meet provincial and federal standards.
6.4.3. The level of security in the animal facilities is adequate for the protection of the animals housed therein and for the personnel working with the animals. This shall be reviewed on a regular basis.
6.4.4. Recommendations are provided to departmental administration who oversee each facility in regard to necessary developments/improvements, maintenance, and use of the animal facilities in their charge.
6.5. Education Mandate
6.5.1. On-going educational programs consistent with the CCAC guidelines on: institutional animal user training are available for all personnel who will handle animals (i.e. principal investigators, course instructors, post doctoral fellows, research and technical staff, graduate and undergraduate students) on issues related to the proper care and use of animals in teaching and research, including but not limited to, the ethics of animal experimentation, species-appropriate anaesthesia and analgesia, aseptic surgical techniques, establishment of humane endpoints, surgical monitoring, and legislation applicable to laboratory use and care. Teaching and Learning Modules are available through the ACC web site
6.5.2. All personnel (i.e. principal investigators, course instructors, post doctoral fellows, research and technical staff, graduate and undergraduate students) engaged in the care and maintenance of animals must be adequately trained and qualified. Opportunities for participation in on-line and external continuing education programs are now available 24/7.
6.5.3. Liaison occurs with the academic community to ensure researchers and instructors receive current information pertaining to provincial regulations and federal guidelines as well as current institutional policies and practices.
6.5.4. Liaison occurs and recommendations are made as needed to appropriate committees within the University so that information can be provided to the general public on matters concerning animal welfare and research and teaching activities involving animals at this University.
6.5.5. Liaison occurs and recommendations are made as needed to appropriate committees within the University so that the safety and security of both the animals and persons involved with the animals are ensured.
6.5.6. Alternatives to use of animals in teaching and research activities should be encouraged wherever possible.
7.1. The Animal Use Data Form is accurately completed and submitted on an annual basis and by the required date to the Canadian Council on Animal Care.
8.0. Appeal Process
8.1. Informal Appeal
8.1.1. A researcher or instructor, who is in disagreement with the decisions of the ACC with respect to any aspect of his/her research project/program regarding the use of animals, may appeal this decision by writing to the Animal Care Coordinator.
8.1.2. The Animal Care Coordinator shall forward the appeal document(s) to the ACC members for discussion at the meeting immediately following receipt of the appeal or at a specially called meeting.
8.1.3. The ACC will review the written document and any additional supporting materials provided by the researcher. An informal meeting may be called between the ACC and the researcher to further discuss the matter.
8.1.4. Following consideration of any additional information, the ACC will reach a decision as to whether or not the additional information/explanation provided by the researcher will result in a change to the ACC decision. Every attempt will be made by the ACC in consultation with the researcher to reach a resolution by informal means.
8.2. Formal Appeal
8.2.1. In the event that a resolution of the matter has not been reached through the informal appeal process, the researcher will refer the matter to the Vice-President, Research for opinion and decision.
8.2.2. The Vice-President, Research will review documentation provided by the Committee and the researcher, and will consult with others as required, including but not limited to, members of the ACC, the researcher, and the Canadian Council on Animal Care.
8.2.3. The Vice-President, Research will issue a decision on the matter in writing with copies to the researcher and the ACC. This decision will be final.
8.3. Conflict of Interest
8.3.1. Actual or potential conflict of interest arises when a member (faculty or staff) of the University of Windsor is in a position to influence decisions made by the ACC which will benefit, either financially or personally, either that member or a person with whom the member has a relationship.
8.3.2. Should such occasion occur, the member must:
i. declare the nature and extent of the interest as soon as possible and no later than the meeting(s) at which the matter is to be considered;
ii. if a member of the ACC, withdraws from the meeting where the matter is being discussed;
iii. refrain from taking part in any other discussion of the matter; and
iv. refrain from voting on the matter.
Revised, Animal Care Committee, April 20, 2008; April 11, 2011, October 6, 2011
Previously revised, October 2004, October 2006